Dear's book, “O.J. Is Innocent and I Can Prove It”, says that the real killer was O.J.'s oldest son, Jason.
Seriously, is this an April Fool's joke or something? I don't know, but Dear theorized why O.J. was innocent and Jason was the one they should've been looking for.
Dear has spent 17 years de-constructing the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman on the night of June 12, 1994.
Digging through his prime suspect’s trash and abandoned storage locker, Dear says a treasure trove of circumstantial evidence points to the 41-year-old son.
According to Dear, among the items he found in the locker were a hunting knife, owned by the “overlooked suspect,” that forensic experts believe is the murder weapon never found by investigators and photos of Jason wearing knit caps similar to one at the crime scene that failed to be linked to his dad.
Dear questions why his suspect was never interviewed by police nor his fingerprints or DNA compared to unidentified ones at the crime scene.
Jason battled with “intermittent rage disorder” and assaulted his girlfriend two months prior to the murders, Dear claims.
He also contends that Jason confesses to having a Jekyll-and-Hyde personality and heavy drug use and cryptically declares “that this is the year of the knife for me” in his diary.
He could be right and I've always said that if O.J. didn't do it he knew who did. Maybe he put Jason up to it. I just don't know.
The worse part of it is that the families of Brown and Goldman have to think about this tragedy once again.
1 comment:
I still believe O.J. Is the killer, but his son? Not a bad theory! But think about it. It was O.J.! Looking at O.J.'s sick murderous eyes, evil grin, and fake charm makes me want to barf. Oh well, our justice system may have found him innocent, but when he dies, God won't. Something tells me O.J. is going to spend eternity as Satan's personal sex slave.
Post a Comment